|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [Help-smalltalk] Community sprint |
Date: | Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:15:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Yes, you made a very important point. We need something that pleases the multitude of programmers (the mountain), but that is not too different from traditional Smalltalk (Mohammed). So yes, my quotation was backwards because I never remember the right one :-) but it made this point more clear that way. :-)You're quite right, but I think that that declaration is no more readable than a C function signature, whereas the traditional Smalltalk signature is much more readable. Also, with the entire method definition in square brackets, it looks the same as the contents of a method browser in any other Smalltalk, examples in books, etc.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |