It seems that I have to be more clear on my problem with GST.
1. To Janko, for squeak+swazoo case, I make it sure that the simple
helloworld.html(MyResource) example runs well but this case uploading
performance is the issue.
2. To Paolo, for gst+swazoo, I even cannot run above simple helloworld.html
example. If I can get any meaningful result from ctrl+c when gst.exe takes
100% cpu from web browser request(in fact simple telnet I can make this
happen).
Thank you very much for your interest and kind support.
----- Original Message -----
From: Janko Mivšek <address@hidden>
To: GNU Smalltalk <address@hidden>, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
Sent: 08-07-24 20:21:29
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [Q] GST support TCP on Windows?
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Portability between Linux, Windows and Mac OS X is biggest
consideration of this project and I thought Smalltalk(Squeak or GST)
might be best solution for this work. But after some testing even
Smalltalk is great environment/platform, this kind of task might not
be appropriate for it.
Thank you, if you have any suggestion or fix please let me know.
It's a little sad, because this is just a portability problem and it's
exactly the case where user input can be most useful (remember that your
input led to a dramatic improvement in multi-byte character set support,
for example). Unfortunately, until I get a decent Windows machine there
is not much that I can do about this.
Do you have a clue of where the 100% load goes (e.g. what happens if you
type Ctrl-C?).
I just responded to Swazoo mailing list and the reason is probably the
same on all Smalltalks: generating a lot of small garbage, so that GC
has a plenty of work. We need to optimize POST streaming parser then an
upload performance should be similar to the download one.
Paolo, by the way, did you do some benchmarks on GST already?
Best regards
Janko