[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework
From: |
Holger Hans Peter Freyther |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:19:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Gwenaël Casaccio wrote:
Hi,
> And as Paolo says it was never really used.
well, that is a good reason. There is no reason to have a half done
security framework.
> >>- p.untrustedContext = IS_OOP_UNTRUSTED (_gst_this_context_oop);
> >>+ p.untrustedContext = false;
> >What is the reason to leave the untrustedContext around?
>
> Thanks I will remove it
thanks. What would be very nice is to have something like sunspider for
GST. A set of tests/examples that we want to optimize for (because I am
biased it would be the GSM parsing and formating code I have) and run
the benchmark after any libgst/ and kernel/ change.
holger