Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail

[Christopher Dimech]

> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 at 9:33 PM
> From: "Patrice Dumas" <pertusus@free.fr>
> To: "Christopher Dimech" <dimech@gmx.com>
> Cc: "help-texinfo gnu" <help-texinfo@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:32:08PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > Have noticed that when using @image for html output, setting
> > the width and height fails.
>
> Not sure what you mean about that, but it is documented that
>
>  The optional WIDTH and HEIGHT arguments to the '@image' command (see the
>  previous section) specify the size to which to scale the image.  They
>  are only taken into account in TeX.
>
> --
> Pat

The problem that I have encountered war that the image was to large
and the text too small.  Then when I zoom, and the text becomes
big enough, the image becomes enormous that I cannot view it.

The end result is that I have to continue to zoom in and out to
see the text and the image.  Had also pointed out that for html
output, putting the extension period (i.e. ".png") gets @image
to fail.  You have to write @image{file,w,h,altText,png} to get
the image to display.

Regards
Christopher