[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flag day for 64-bit?
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: flag day for 64-bit? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:37:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:27:32PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > The libc work will be the only thing of any substance, and that
> > > just some cut & paste. It's just replacing foo64 functions that
> > > do overflow checks and call foo with foo functions that just
> > > call foo64.
> > Are you thinking glibc 2.2 or 2.3?
> I was thinking tomorrow (so 2.2).
Sounds lovely. If it's early enough, perhaps the local GNU/Hurd users
group can stare at the screen and beat it up a little. It will be me,
Simon, Ryan, and James.
I don't remember the conversations you referred to in your other email
- What would we test for to measure success (as in, how will we know
it's good enough to upload)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
One of the great things about books is sometimes
there are some fantastic pictures.
-- George W. Bush
- flag day for 64-bit?, Roland McGrath, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Roland McGrath, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Roland McGrath, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/06/07
- Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/06/08
Re: flag day for 64-bit?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/06/07