|
From: | Roland McGrath |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects |
Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2002 03:05:41 -0500 (EST) |
> Is that a (however reluctant) ok for the "MACH_PORT_NULL; -1; size" proposal? That is ok by me. It's also ok by me for all MACH_PORT_NULL cases to be a characteristic error right now, and implement it later if it ever comes up.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |