[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: arch
From: |
david |
Subject: |
Re: arch |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:24:03 -0500 (CDT) |
> address@hidden writes:
>
> >> Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it,
> >> but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
> >>
> > Do you have any sort of URL? "arch" isn't something that lends
> > itself to a Google search, so I don't really know where to find
> > it.
>
> http://www.regexps.com/ but the arch area is unavailable right now.
>
Thank you, but in that case I wouldn't describe it as an improvement,
since both CVS and subversion have at least a presence, and are
available. I currently don't consider subversion as an improvement
over CVS, since I trust CVS as I can download it today far more
than subversion as I can download it today. I will keep an eye
on that URL, though.
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask.
address@hidden | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-
- arch, Chris Beggy, 2002/04/07