[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Labels? (Was: Re: revision/version numbers)
From: |
Paul Sander |
Subject: |
Re: Labels? (Was: Re: revision/version numbers) |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:29:39 -0800 |
>--- Forwarded mail from address@hidden
>Jim.Hyslop wrote:
>> address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden wrote:
>>
>>>Labels are not immutable; they can be moved around. Some
>--[clip]--
>> Then the label should clearly indicate it's the "latest version". A version
>> handed off to QA is not the latest version, and should have a unique label.
>--[clip]--
>> So don't label every build. You label the *important* builds - the ones that
>I am confused a bit. All this talk of "labels" makes wonder if I missed
>a CVS concept somewhere.
>Is a "label" a special kind of tag? Or, is there as CVS "label
>operation" to make a label as opposed to a tag?
The terms "label" and "version tag" are often used interchangeably in this
forum.
>--- End of forwarded message from address@hidden
- Re: revision/version numbers, (continued)
- RE: revision/version numbers, Katherine King, 2003/10/31
- RE: revision/version numbers, Bert Robbins, 2003/10/31
- RE: revision/version numbers, Katherine King, 2003/10/31
- RE: revision/version numbers, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/10/31
- RE: revision/version numbers, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/10/31