info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Strategy for tracking 3rd party source.


From: Dave Korn
Subject: RE: Strategy for tracking 3rd party source.
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:28:18 +0100

----Original Message----
>From: address@hidden
>Sent: 31 August 2005 04:41

> I need to track some 3rd party source code, in this case the Linux
> kernel and then manage our local modifications to the kernel (don't
> worry, GPL is being respected).  I've run into an issue where an
> import updates files on the HEAD and I'm not sure if I want this to
> happen.

  You stole my life!

> For example, I import a kernel with the vendor tag of KERNEL_ORG and a
> release tag of LINUX_2_6_12.  I add my local changes and commit them.
> All is well.

  Well, actually I used KERNEL_ORG and KERNEL_2_6_7 myself, but so far we're
in the same boat.

> There are 2 projects that pull the HEAD from this module into their
> projects, this works pretty well.  The problem arises when I import a
> new version of the kernel, say LINUX_2_6_13. 

  Or indeed KERNEL_2_6_12_5.

> Its possible that it
> could be a while (couple of days) before HEAD is working again - not
> an ideal situation for the projects that depend on this module.
> 
> What I am thinking of doing is reserving HEAD for the 3rd party source
> and then making a branch, MYBRANCH.  The other projects can then pull
> from MYBRANCH (our internal HEAD so to speak), I can then do the
> import, merge the changes into MYBRANCH and commit the working code
> into MYBRANCH after its working.  That way MYBRANCH is always usable.
> 
> Is this a reasonable approach?  Is there a better way?
> 
> Thanks for any comments/suggestions/insight..
> 
> -- Jason


  See this thread for more information and much discussion:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2005-08/msg00236.html

  I think your suggestion to use a branch is probably sound.  Use rtag to
set a tag based on a date/time about five minutes before you imported the
new version and base your branch on that.

    cheers,
      DaveK

PS.  Your badge and sooper-sekritt decoder ring are in the post!
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]