[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved] |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:11:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Memnon Anon
<gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> wrote:
MA> Solved!
MA> As I said, gnus per se did not add the message-id.
MA> I confirmed this again by using
MA> (setq message-generate-headers-first t).
MA> No Message-Id was generated, but mail in ~/Mail/queued-mail/
MA> had a Message-Id.
MA> So I had a look at smtpmail.el. This file contains these lines:
MA> ;; Insert a `Message-Id:' field if there isn't one yet.
MA> (goto-char (point-min))
MA> (unless (re-search-forward "^Message-Id:" delimline t)
MA> (insert "Message-Id: " (message-make-message-id) "\n"))
MA> I just
MA> - copied the file to smtpmail-changed.el
MA> - added ;; in front of each of those three lines
MA> - changed the last line to (provide 'smtpmail-changed)
MA> - changed my .gnus to (require 'smtpmail-changed)
MA> Now, my Message-Id is set by the google smtp-server ;)
MA> Great!
MA> Thanks to the author of smtpmail.el for extensively documenting
MA> each single step in there!
Is this required for Google SMTP? We could make it a smtpmail.el option
that you can just turn off as needed (per server).
Ted
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/04
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/08
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved],
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/11
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/17