[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved] |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:53:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Memnon Anon
<gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> wrote:
MA> Ted Zlatanov schrieb:
>> Is this required for Google SMTP? We could make it a smtpmail.el option
>> that you can just turn off as needed (per server).
MA> No, it is not required for google smtp. I just wanted my message id
MA> not to be created on my machine. I've got a invalid fqdn. So, why
MA> not let google do it.
MA> Should there be an option?
You can set your user-mail-address and the FQDN for the message ID will
be automatically deduced from it (by message-make-fqdn, which calls
message-user-mail-address). Is that sufficient or do you need do set
the domain of the message ID separately from your user-mail-address?
Ted
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/04
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/08
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/09
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved],
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/11
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/17