[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved]
From: |
Memnon Anon |
Subject: |
Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved] |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:06:07 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On 10 Jul., 16:53, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> You can set your user-mail-address and the FQDN for the message ID will
> be automatically deduced from it (by message-make-fqdn, which calls
> message-user-mail-address). Is that sufficient or do you need do set
> the domain of the message ID separately from your user-mail-address?
I just checked. I added those 3 lines again and sent a mail to my
other mail
account. Result:
Message-Id: <83d4ljuakt.fsf@home.localdomain>
This is no vaild id. My machine is named home.
And even if there would be Message-Id:
<83d4ljuakt.fsf@googlemail.com>,
this would still not be vaild, because my machine has no
right to create a message Id like this.
This might result in duplicate M-ID, which is usually no problem.
But using Mailing lists, there is a tiny little chance this might be a
problem.
So this approach is just not clean, AFAIK.
No, the smtp-server creates my M-ID and I am pretty sure that google
knows
how to avoid duplicate ones ;).
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/04
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, renaudr, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct?, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/07
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/08
- Re: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/09
- Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Memnon Anon, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/10
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved],
Memnon Anon <=
- Re: Option for sendmail.el WAS: FAQ 5.2 still correct? [solved], Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Option for sendmail.el, Memnon Anon, 2008/07/17