[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?
From: |
Frank Fredstone |
Subject: |
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:39:12 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:57:47 -0800 Frank Fredstone <none@not.no> wrote:
>
> FF> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>>> Run emacs -q and load this:
>>>
>>> (require 'gnus)
>>> ;; untested primary select method, should work though
>>> (setq gnus-select-method '(nnnil "nothing"))
>>>
>>> (setq mail-sources nil
>>> gnus-secondary-select-methods '((nnml "mail"
>>> (nnml-get-new-mail nil)
>>> ;; should not be necessary but just in case...
>>> (nnmail-get-new-mail nil))))
>>>
>>> Does your inbox still get emptied? What's in *Messages*?
>
> FF> Thanks. No, it is not emptied. Messages contains:
>
> OK, excellent. So there's something not in this configuration but in
> yours that triggers the emptying. This is your configuration:
>
> (require 'gnus)
> (setq gnus-select-method '(nntp "news.evilmegacorp.com"))
> (setq mail-sources nil
> gnus-secondary-select-methods
> '((nnml "mail")
> (nnimap "asdf"
> (nnimap-address "localhost")
> (nnimap-server-port 143)
> (nnimap-stream network))))
>
> Can you try emacs -q and see if your configuration as stated above
> empties your inbox?
Thank you! This doesn't empty the inbox and the inbox is mapped to
nnimap:asdf:INBOX. So, I can start adding things back and hopefully
see where things break.
I should have been able to go through that process too, but I was
afraid to lose email. Thanks again.
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, (continued)
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?,
Frank Fredstone <=
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/09
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/13
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/13
- better bug reporting (was: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/14
- Re: better bug reporting, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/14
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/07