[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PG
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:43:45 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.5-b29 (linux) |
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:51:17 +0200, Merciadri wrote:
> I tried, but to no avail. I did not try for hours, because I don't
> like devoting much time to a light problem such as this one (I have
> other problems to solve first).
Fair enough. It sounded like you didn't try at all, that is why I was on
your case so much.
>> How would a "somewhat exact solution" to your problem look?
> Using the best PGP package with as few problems as possible.
How is that a somewhat exact solution to the problem of finding out what
messes up your configuration when you take Mailcrypt out of the
equation?
[...]
> What a student gives on his paper after an exam is a set of different
> `solutions,' hoping one for each question, by definition.
> These solutions are expected to be as much exact as possible.
This sentence doesn't make sense to me. Either a solution is exact, or
it isn't - now, a solution might be almost correct, somewhat correct,
mostly wrong or entirely wrong, for instance, but it is either exact or
it isn't.
[...]
> But saying that a solution is either correct or not is, at least to
> me, too `black-and-white.' Between black and white, there's also gray
> :)
I never said that a solution was either _correct_ or not. Again you are
putting words in my mouth. Please try to avoid this, it is rude.
I said a solution was either _exact_ or not. "correct" and "exact" are
very different words and concepts.
We clearly have problems understanding eachother; I'll stop trying and
crawl back in my hole now.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"My internal clock is on Tokyo time." Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, (continued)
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/12/08