[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?
From: |
Enrico Schumann |
Subject: |
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:02:30 +0100 |
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Adam Sjøgren writes:
> Sivaram writes:
>
>> Right, what's the difference between * and ! then? I was told to use
>> * a few years back. I believe I mentioned that I wanted to keep the
>> article around indefinitely
>
> * stores a copy of the article on your local machine (article caching).
> ! makes the article show in the group, even though it is read (ticking).
>
> See: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_37.html
>
> So if you are reading articles on a news server with a short retention
> time, you probably want to use both.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Adam
When 'gnus-use-cache' is t, ticking (!) will also copy the
article to the cache. See http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_42.html .
Kind regards
Enrico
--
Enrico Schumann
Lucerne, Switzerland
http://enricoschumann.net
- retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Adam Sjøgren, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?,
Enrico Schumann <=
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Enrico Schumann, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric S Fraga, 2017/02/28
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/27