Re: Is *.jami.net down?

[Óvári]

Hi Adrien,

Thought you might be interested in the pings which are shown below.

Are *ns1.ring.cx* and *ns2.ring.cx* incorrect?

Thank you

Óvári


$ ping jami.net

PING jami.net (158.69.38.145) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from jami.net (158.69.38.145): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=231 ms
64 bytes from jami.net (158.69.38.145): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=230 ms


$ ping ns.ring.cx
PING ns.jami.net (192.95.9.35) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from jami-ethereumvm-03.savoirfairelinux.net (192.95.9.35): 
icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=231 ms
64 bytes from jami-ethereumvm-03.savoirfairelinux.net (192.95.9.35): 
icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=232 ms


$ ping ns1.ring.cx
PING ns1.ring.cx(ip6-localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ip6-localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.055 ms
64 bytes from ip6-localhost (::1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.079 ms


$ ping ns2.ring.cx
PING ns2.ring.cx(ip6-localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ip6-localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.061 ms
64 bytes from ip6-localhost (::1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms

On 28/6/20 5:13 am, Adrien Béraud wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> After investigations, we found there was indeed a problem with our DNSSEC 
> configuration, which should now be fixed.
> Apologies for any related issues.
>
> Plej amike ;-)
>
> Adrien Béraud
> Jami project
> Savoir-faire Linux
>
>
> De: "bill-auger" <bill-auger@peers.community>
> À: "jami" <jami@gnu.org>
> Envoyé: Samedi 27 Juin 2020 00:55:34
> Objet: Re: Is *.jami.net down?
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:18:51 -0500 Nathan wrote:
> > Also a curiosity, what language is "Nomo aŭ servo ne konatas"?
> its esperanto - i have my whole system set to it - it is
> surprisingly well-supported by most software
>
> "artificial" is not the best word really - that just means
> "created by people and not found in nature" - so all languages
> are artificial - its not like you can dig one out of the ground
> or pluck one off a tree - linguist nerds call esperanto and
> klingon "constructed languages" - there are many others that
> i had no idea existed either - apparently, linguists invent them
> for fun
>
> esperanto is in a different category though - it is also called a
> "planned language"; because unlike klingon and most others, it
> was invented with the intention that it would actually be used
> generally - esperanto buffs call it "the international language"
> - the idea is that it is very easy to learn, and can be a
> universal second language for everyone, but a first language to
> no one
>
> curiously, i have found that most people who know it, are either
> musicians or programmers or both - it is especially appealing to
> programmers because of its regular grammar - learning it has
> been a nice brain-bender