[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches
From: |
KO Myung-Hun |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:12:56 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/10.0.6esrpre SeaMonkey/2.7.2 |
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. Things have been busy for me.
>
No problem. ^^
> It is interesting to hear back after the 5 or so years. About a month and a
> half ago we were discussing dropping libcdio's OS/2 driver altogether. See
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libcdio-devel/2014-06/msg00004.html
>
> What motivated this was the desire to change the API to add get_track_isrc
> and Robert Kausch mentioned he had no way to test OS/2. In that, we
> realized that basically no one *is* actively testing OS/2.
>
> Aside from yourself and possibly Natalia, do you know anyone else that is
> using this?
>
I don't know. But those who want to build MPlayer with audio cd
supports, would be using libcdio.
> Given the low activity and difficulty for finding developers and testers,
> I'm inclined to have this maintained by you and Natalia in separately. She
> already has a fork on github of libcdio-paranoia.
>
> If OS/2 is to survive in libcdio, someone needs to commit to handle
> problems and API changes as such things arise. Are you willing to commit to
> this?
>
Of course. Five years ago, it's me to submit OS/2 patches as you know. ^^
> Lastly, on the first patch. It has to do with deciding on whether the use
> the libcdio-supplied getopt.c,and this is based purely on OS. OS/2 is the
> only one to not used the supplied getopt.c
>
> Rather than have a test by OS, I'd prefer a test to compile the supplied
> getopt; if that fails, then run a test to see if there is an OS getopt.
>
Ok. What about testing an OS getopt first ? I think, it's better to
consider libcdio-getopt as a fallback.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:50 PM, KO Myung-Hun <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Ping ?
>>
>> KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>>> Hi/2, long tiem no see. ^^
>>>
>>> I attach the patches to build libcdio and to enhance memory usage on
>> OS/2.
>>>
>>> Review, please...
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
KO Myung-Hun
Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM
Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
- [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/20
- [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/20
- [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Fix linkage on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/20
- [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Make high memory safe on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/20
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/26
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches,
KO Myung-Hun <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, Rocky Bernstein, 2014/07/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, KO Myung-Hun, 2014/07/29
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, Rocky Bernstein, 2014/07/30
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, Rocky Bernstein, 2014/07/30
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] OS/2 patches, Natalia Portillo, 2014/07/30