[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Thomas Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Dec 2018 20:40:00 +0100 |
Hi,
Edd Barrett wrote:
> I've finally found some time to look at this. The following diff seems
> to work, although I don't think I have any CDs where the first track
> number isn't 1 to test with.
Commercial test candidates would be second CDs of a multi-CD album.
Self-made CDs can get arbitrary start track numbers by the .cue file format
which is understood (among others) by cdrdao, cdrecord, wodim, cdrskin.
(See "Example of a CDRWIN cue sheet file named NIGHTCATS.CUE" in
https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libburn/raw/master/doc/cdtext.txt
where "TRACK 01 AUDIO" could be "TRACK 07 AUDIO" followed by tracks 08
and 09. Maximum permittable track number is 99.)
cdrskin has an option cd_start_tno= for a run with just a few .wav files.
Like:
cdrskin -v dev=/dev/rcd0d cd_start_tno=7 trackA.wav trackB.wav trackC.wav
> https://github.com/vext01/libcdio/commit/d04c48e36e7bb810dede415950a8cdf69e625e0a
The changes look good so far.
But a gesture in lib/driver/gnu_linux.c (and also lib/driver/solaris.c)
still differs from the one in lib/driver/netbsd.c.
------------------- gnu_linux.c:
if (i_track == CDIO_CDROM_LEADOUT_TRACK)
i_track = p_env->gen.i_tracks + p_env->gen.i_first_track;
------------------- netbsd.c:
#define TOTAL_TRACKS (_obj->tochdr.ending_track \
- _obj->tochdr.starting_track + 1)
...
if (track_num == CDIO_CDROM_LEADOUT_TRACK)
track_num = TOTAL_TRACKS + 1;
TOTAL_TRACKS looks like the number of tracks on the CD.
But both, gnu_linux.c and now also netbsd.c consider
(_obj->gen.i_first_track + _obj->gen.i_tracks)
as highest permissible value of the nominal track number (i_track and
track_num, respectively). That's one higher than the highest nominal
track number found on CD.
So i guess that netbsd.c should now join gnu_linux.c in setting the
nominal track number of the lead-out track to that value.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Thomas Schmitt <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/03
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09