[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Edd Barrett |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Dec 2018 14:17:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) |
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your on-going patience.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 10:11:35AM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Edd first has to test the current state (which should show wrong info
> > about leadout if first_track > 1) and then my proposal.
I think Thomas is right.
If I print the computed leadout for my 5-track CD starting at 7:
---8<---
TOTAL_TRACKS + 1 = 6
_obj->gen.i_tracks + _obj->gen.i_first_track = 12
--->8---
Clearly the leadout track should be 12, not 6.
Note however that the cd-info output is correct both before and after this fix:
https://github.com/vext01/libcdio/commit/539c52488506c5bacdfebbcafc5406034a0738fd
(Note that I reverted my cd-info change in favour of Rocky's)
---8<---
CD-ROM Track List (7 - 5)
#: MSF LSN Type Green? Copy? Channels Premphasis?
7: 00:02:00 000000 audio false no 0 no
8: 03:07:72 013947 audio false no 0 no
9: 05:46:12 025812 audio false no 0 no
10: 07:24:74 033224 audio false no 0 no
11: 09:41:34 043459 audio false no 0 no
170: 09:41:34 043459 leadout (97 MB raw, 97 MB formatted)
--->8---
This looks correct to me.
Regardless, cd-paranoia is still upset:
---8<---
$ ./inst/bin/cd-paranoia -B
cdparanoia III release 10.2 libcdio 2.0.0 x86_64-unknown-openbsd6.4
(C) 2001 Monty <address@hidden> and Xiphophorus
(C) 2004, 2005, 2008 Rocky Bernstein <address@hidden>
(C) 2014 Robert Kausch <address@hidden>
Report bugs to address@hidden
009: CDROM reporting illegal table of contents
Unable to open disc.
--->8---
I'm going to have to look deeper into this one. Any pointer appreciated of
course :)
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/03
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/10