Re: [Libcdio-devel] Ready for merging: libcdio branch trackno-higher-one

[Rocky Bernstein]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM Thomas Schmitt <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> > it would be great to
> > create a test for this change. As with libcdio-paranoia I guess this
> would
> > include a CD image of the right sort.
>
> We could make a new .cue file with content
>
>   FILE "cdda.bin"  BINARY
>     TRACK 07 AUDIO
>       FLAGS DCP
>       INDEX 01 00:00:00
>     TRACK 08 AUDIO
>       FLAGS DCP
>       INDEX 01 00:02:00
>
> libcdio has files test/cdda.bin and test/data/cdda.bin.
> libcdio-paranoia has test/data/cdda.bin.
> All with identical content of 302 frames = 00:04:02.
>
> But i did not test whether this .cue file content would cause the various
> CD burner programs to write track 7 and 8 rather than 1 and 2.
> (At least with cdrskin option "cuefile=" i am optimistic.)
>
> How would a new .cue file be used for testing in libcdio ? I am quite
> clueless in front of test/check_cue.sh.in and test/check_common_fn.in.
>
>
> I tried above .cue content as file
>   test/data/cdda_track_4_5.cue
> and ran
>
>   cd test && ../src/cd-info --no-device-info --cue-file
> data/cdda_track_4_5.cue
>
> But this refused to work because of missing file cdda_track_4_5.bin until
> i created a link
>
>   ln -s ./cdda.bin ./test/data/cdda_track_4_5.bin
>
> So does cd-info not read the FILE name from .cue ?
>

That code was written over a decade ago. I really don't remember.

If only there was some way an open source project had available where this
could be figured out....


> (The displaid track numbering is wrong: 1 and 2 instead of 4 and 5.
>  Are Edd's changes for libcdio already merged in ?)
>

If only git had a way of tracking what's going on so we could figure this
out....


>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
>