[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] MHD_suspend_connection API
From: |
Luke-Jr |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] MHD_suspend_connection API |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:46:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.6-gentoo; KDE/4.11.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:08:14 AM Jared Cantwell wrote:
> 1. After we receive some data in the access handler callback
> (*upload_data_size > 0) we decide whether we've buffered enough internally,
> and if so, we call MHD_suspend_connection()
>
> We do not call this on the final callback with *upload_data_size == 0 since
> we will not get another callback from mHTTPD
Unfortunately, I want to read the entire upload buffer before I suspend.
Fortunately, this specific use case I'm trying to address would probably not
fail too badly if I defer all reading until after the suspend/resume.
Therefore, I have modified my code to suspend during the initial call to the
access handler callback (which also initialises *con_cls).
> 2. In the background (on another thread), we process the data we have
> buffered. If the buffer shrinks enough, we call MHD_resume_connection()
>
> 3. We will get called back in the access handler after we resume, and we
> have also seen occasional callbacks while suspended, which we ignore; we
> keep track of our suspended state.
Unfortunately, I am not seeing any callback after I call
MHD_resume_connection(). I do consistently get another callback immediately
after MHD_suspend_connection(), however...
What do you return from the callback after you do MHD_suspend_connection? If I
return MHD_NO, my connection gets closed, so I am returning MHD_YES for now.
> 4. We are running the server with these options:
>
> MHD_USE_SUSPEND_RESUME (which in turn implies MHD_USE_PIPE_FOR_SHUTDOWN)
> MHD_USE_SELECT_INTERNALLY
>
> and we have passed in a value for MHD_OPTION_THREAD_POOL_SIZE to use a
> thread pool
My only difference here is not using a thread pool.
Luke