On 23/05/2015 22:19, Logan Streondj wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Logan Streondj* <streondj@gmail.com <mailto:streondj@gmail.com>>
Date: Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] The FSF Allows No Derivatives,
To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org <mailto:rms@gnu.org>>
If there were a way to permit only correct, clear translation,
I would permit that -- but there is no realistic way to assure
that a translation is correct.
#english: if thou write opinion in speak program language then
capable it translate clear. we live in time with many
languages. capable many
peoples benefit from liberty
opinion. translate program improve with time and code.
write by Logan.
I have no capability to emit an opinion on how #english has capability
to render English. (but see below)
#español: si tú a-escribir la-opinión en idioma programa
hablar entonces capaz ello traducir claro . nosotros
vivir en tiempo con muchos idiomas. capaz muchos
gente ser beneficio desde la-opinión libertad.
programa traducir mejorar con tiempo y código.
a-escribir por Logan.
#русский: если ты запись мнение, в говоритьом программаом
языку тогда способный оно́ перевести ясно. мы жить в време с
myi языком. способный myi люди, выгода от
свободаом
мнени. перевестая программа, улучшать с ki . запись
по Logan.
#français: si tu écrire l'opinion, en la langue programme
parler, puis capable on traduire le clair. le nous , vivre en
le temps, avec les beaucoup langues. capable les
beaucoup personness. dès l'opinion liberté. la
programme traduire, améliorer avec le temps et code.
écrire par le Logan.
That one (French) is near enough from "Novlangue" (Newspeak) to be
unreadable.
#nodejs: {"if":(thee .write(opinion, {"in":(language .program
.speak)})), "then":(/*capable*/it .
.translate(clear))}); we .live({"in":(time),
"with":(many .language)}); /*capable*/many people
.benefit({"from":(opinion .liberty)}); program
.translate
.improve({"with":(time && code)});
write({"by":(Logan)});
#mwak: wathpyamkwalni tuhu piynha yishhi ku tihu kliyha tyifhi
kiphtwahya kwalmyihmwah taymni wihu lishhiya luntmyihhu
liyspiynsu lafthi kiphya taymki kuwtmwah tyifpyamhu
muyphiya Loganhwu yishhiya
See http://gnu.org/philosophy/copyright-vs-community.html for my views
about modification of non-functional works such as art and opinion.
Please see just above an opinion English written. As see above again [at
#fr], SPEL will not help. I even doubt on an ideogram-written programing
language to render any philosophical, ethical or wathever complex whole idea
(because any program will fall under Türing imitation game test
on that
only idea itself).
In fact, these code snippets have nothing to do with the former thread.
You just found a 4 lines relevant quote
you could cling.
You want a thread on SPEL (and what is behind)? You want spread it?
Write a/several consistent(s) article(s), and/or find other relevants
one, on pages we can find, then start a thread with a set of URI. You
tried once, but have stumbled on the positive set (how it can helps,
what are the principles, how have you been helped regarding semantics,
also how it could be improved regarding semantic, including limits...).
And last, please stop flood on that list: it just deserves your project
(there are good aspects on, really, but IMHO should be turned in
something near enough a "formal programming" "interpretor", tranlated).
Regards,
TSFH