fyi
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New
version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:53:11 -0300
From: coadde <
coadde@riseup.net>
To: Parabola Mail List <
dev@lists.parabola.nu>
On 06/09/2016 08:46 PM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>>
>>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will
>>> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux',
>>> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard
>>> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem.
>>
>> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
>
> +1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the
> Social Contract.
+1
signature.asc