libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-


From: IngeGNUe
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 20:50:53 -0400

On 06/16/16 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 
> Quoting part of a statement correctly is legitimate because that
> practice is necessary for intellectual conversation.  Quoting
> incorrectly can be misleading; I am not sure if that is fair use.
> Publishing a modified version of someone else's statement is far more
> misleading.  Thus, I recommend the Noderivatives condition for
> statements of opinion.
> 

Hey all, I think CC resolved this issue in version 4.0:

"In 4.0, you must indicate if you modified the material and retain an
indication of previous modifications. In 3.0 and earlier license
versions, the indication of changes is only required if you create a
derivative."

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (Quote above found when you
click the link "indicate if changes were made".)

https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/License_Versions#Modifications_and_adaptations_must_be_indicated

What do you think?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]