[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for non-code
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] GPL for non-code |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:45:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:31:00PM +0000, Lyberta wrote:
> We have GPL that requires access to the source code of the programs.
> However, we don't have a license for non-code such as text, images,
> audio and video.
>
> The most freedom-friendly and recognized license for those works is
> CC-BY-SA but it doesn't require releasing the source code such as LaTeX
> files, GIMP files, DAW projects and video projects.
>
> Was there any work done towards this kind of license?
You can release non-software under the GPL as well,
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOtherThanSoftware
By the way, CC BY-SA allows relicensing under the GPLv3,
https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature