Re: Support RMS

[Paul Sutton]

On 27/03/2021 19:59, quiliro wrote:
> Thomas Lord <lord@basiscraft.com> writes:
>
> > > "What we need to do, is have very robust standards of how people
> > > behave,  drawn up by and for the community,"
> >
> > The only "problem" you seem to have a solution for is the one of a few
> > people making fairly ridiculous accusations and complaints.  Your
> > solution is apparently to put them in charge of a much more
> > authoritarian organization.
>
> I also had that impression of this statement by Paul.  But I decided to
> give it the benefit of the doubt.  I think he means just having more
> control of processes, not of people.  Processes encourage good
> relationships.  To motivate would not mean to force.  I think that would
> be good, generally speaking.

Yes,  putting processes are in place to encourage good relationships,  I 
helped to moderate at libreplanet and didn't feel the libreplanet safe 
space policy was in any way dictatorial, it was a short but well written 
set of expectations.

I am just sharing ideas, looks like the fsf have is already making 
changes, but it is better  than people just saying thing have to change, 
sometimes you need to suggest ideas and input, rather than just 
demanding change.

Just to say thank you and I appreciate the fact my comments are welcome, 
and hopefully this is a small part of a bigger picture.

Just having the safe space policy may be enough, may be a few tweaks but 
it pretty much covers everything.

Paul

--
--
Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open)
https://personaljournal.ca/paulsutton/
OpenPGP : 4350 91C4 C8FB 681B 23A6 7944 8EA9 1B51 E27E 3D99

Pronoun : him/his/he

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature