[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:15:38 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> Could someone explain exactly why libltdl is thread unsafe, e.g. what
> it need these locking functions for, in the first place?
I should mention that lazy symbol resolution could potentially cause
problems in a mutithreaded application since if a symbol is accessed
which was not already accessed, then the run-time linker will execute
code to resolve that symbol. It may be that the complete application
blocks while the symbol is resolved, or perhaps some threads continue
executing on a different CPU. Whether this is an issue is
system-dependent.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- RE: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Howard Chu, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/19
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Alexandre Oliva, 2004/04/20