[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TESTSUITE_FLAGS -> TESTSUITEFLAGS
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: TESTSUITE_FLAGS -> TESTSUITEFLAGS |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de> writes:
>
> Autoconf uses TESTSUITEFLAGS and also documents this in its example
> setup, and I get confused when switching back and forth. OK to apply?
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
> * Makefile.am (check-local, installcheck-local): Use
> `TESTSUITEFLAGS' rather than `TESTSUITE_FLAGS', like Autoconf.
> * HACKING, README, README.alpha: All uses changed.
Yes, please. I recently changed m4 to follow the same paradigm; it is nice
having a documented, consistent variable between projects.
--
Eric Blake