Re: libtool pre-1.5b tests fail on 9 debian arches

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 18:48, Robert Millan wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:36:47PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >>>libtool maintainers: Would you consider giving either Scott or me 
> > >>>(preferably
> > >>>both) with CVS access? That'd help a lot getting libtool in shape for all
> > >>>architectures without having to maintain such a "debian fork" of libtool.
> > 
> > Absolutely.  The FSF will inform me when the paperwork is done,
> 
> Ok. I'll take care about the paperwork. Scott, will you go through this too?
> 
Already done, signed and sent back to the FSF yesterday -- will take a
few days to fly across the pond though I imagine.

> > You must also agree not to commit anything for which you do not have 
> > knowledge of the author, and the author has exchanged paperwork with the 
> > FSF, except for very small patches.
> 
> No problem.
> 
Indeed, also no problem.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part