[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool-HEAD, 20051007, cygwin
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libtool-HEAD, 20051007, cygwin |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 07:52:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:28:52PM CEST:
> I ran into an oddity with 'make dist' recently:
>
> I bootstrapped, compiled, and ran the testsuite[*] on libtool cvs HEAD
> and got the expected results (see attached). I then did a 'make dist'
> (after hand-editing the top-level Makefile to remove references to
> fcdemo, as I do not have f90 installed). Then, using the dist tarball,
> I repeated the process (build, run testsuite).
*snip*
> I have followed this procedure before with no unexpected occurances --
> that is, running the testsuite in the build environment from the tarball
> produced equivalent results as running the testsuite in the build
> environment generated by the cvs working dir.
>
> However, this time, the tarball-derived environment failed a number of
> the "new" tests (see attached):
*snip*
>
> I can only conclude that something is screwy with regards to 'make
> dist'.
Please post tests/testsuite.log containing the failures (packed?).
I cannot reproduce this on GNU/Linux (and you posting should be less
work than me trying to reproduce it on cygwin :)
Thank you,
Ralf