Re: [Lightning] Re: `pushr' on SPARC

[Paolo Bonzini]

> Ok, but isn't that too much tight to the current GCC version?
>   
No, I didn't find any compiler that does not use %g2-%g4 as caller-save 
registers just like %g1.
> OTOH, even if it is, that's arguably not too much of an issue since all
> this will vanish is the next release.
>   
Not if %g2-%g4 are used to host R0-R2, actually.
> > I didn't understand if you would need to add something like "move %g0,
> > %l0" to the prolog?
> >     
>
> Yes (rather `mov %g0, %l7').
>   
Or mov %i6, %l7.

Paolo