[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lightning] Re: About using lightning on a dynamically typed langua
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Lightning] Re: About using lightning on a dynamically typed language |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2010 09:00:07 +0200 |
> The idea is to create several small C functions, for most opcodes, so
> that I don't need to (or should not) bother with c99 complex numbers,
> tls variables, etc from the jit code, only from the small "callbacks".
Makes sense, like a mixture of JIT and threaded code.
BTW in the GNU Smalltalk JIT the superoperators are completely
separated at JIT time. In the interpreter instead there is a program
to generate the "glued" code. The glued code is more efficient
because it avoids writing temporary data to the stack.
Paolo
- [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade, 2010/05/15
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/17
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade, 2010/05/17
- Re: [Lightning] About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade, 2010/05/18
[Lightning] Re: About using lightning on a dynamically typed language, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/17