[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad TeX patch
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bad TeX patch |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:50:24 +0200 (CEST) |
> > It seems that Han-Wen has added this patch for lazyness only to
> > make `tex <lilypond output>' work better. I can understand the
> > wish to make lilypond output compile directly without writing a
> > wrapper document, but the above change is the wrong way. If you
> > agree, I write some code so that `latex <lilypond output>' works
> > out of the box.
>
> I think that parindent is not the proper mechanism for indenting
> musical examples, they're not paragraphs after all.
I'll try to find something better.
> The separate first-line indent for music can not be controlled from
> (la)tex anyway, and for indenting all pieces of music, there are
> other options. (eg. plaintex \narrower, if memory serves me.).
> OTOH, I'll settle for latex <output>. I had to do something,
> otherwise HTML output is completely messed up.
You are releasing faster than allowed :-) Right now I'm improving
lilypond-book,py, and I'm beautifying glosssary.tely, so please don't
hack those two files for a few days...
Werner