Re: improved lilypond-book.py

[Mats Bengtsson]

The glossary hasn't been actively supported for a long time.
Christian Mondrup made a great job bringing it into its 
current shape and I assisted with some Lilypond technicalities.

It would be great if someone could go through the document and
check that all the musical examples still look OK with the 
current Lilypond version and also look over the general 
layout and structure. Regarding its place in the documentation, 
don't forget that the glossary is linked from 
http://icking-music-archive.sunsite.dk/ (directly to its
URL in the development WWW pages), otherwise I don't have
any opinion.

   /Mats


> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Attached is a new version of lilypond-book.py, a completely
> > revised glossary.tely, and an updated lilypond-book.itely.
> 
> Your glossary patch made me have a look at it, and I wonder about a
> few things.
> 
> The glossary is not part of the info documentation.  Should we include
> it in the lilypond manual, eg, as an appendix, or should we rename it
> (ie: lilypond-glossary, musical-glossary), and install it separately?
> 
> Also, I wonder about the klugde with the arrow.  Why not use proper
> references, in html and info?  Some ideas below.
> 
> Jan.