[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where should I send doc patches?
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Where should I send doc patches? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:47:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival writes:
> I think I've got my life organized enough to start sending in doc
> patches again; sorry for the gap. Should I track 2.0.x or 2.1.y?
Good to have you back at it! I would suggest that anything beyond a
necessary fix should go in 2.1. If someone feels the need and has the
time to backport non-critical stuff that's not experimental to 2.0,
that's ok.
> In most cases the documentation fixes will benefit current 2.0
> users, but if I make changes to 2.0, will they get lost when 2.1
> becomes 2.2? Should doc patches be applied to both branches?
No, all real work should always go in 2.1, 2.0 is an option.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org