lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/refman....


From: Heikki Johannes Junes
Subject: Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/refman....
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:57:23 +0200 (EET)

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote:

>
> FYI: According to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, both
> spellings (tying, tieing) are correct.
>
> Greetings,
> Juergen
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Log message:
> >     Fix spell for tying.
> > ...

Strange, spelling `tie, tied, tying' was present both in online version of
Oxford dictionary and in 1999 version of Webster's N.I.D. and word `tieing'
gave no hits.  Actually, it was a surprise for me that `tieing' was not
present in these Oxford and Webster's 1999 dictionary.

Also, if you search `tieing' with Google, it says `Did you mean: tying'.

In contrast, Merriam-Webster online gave a hit:
  http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=tieing

I agree that both are ok. According to the quick search (above) spelling
`tying' has been in wider use.

Greetings,

  Heikki Junes




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]