[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ancient accidental inconsistencies?; Morgenlied quesitons.
From: |
Edward Sanford Sutton, III |
Subject: |
Ancient accidental inconsistencies?; Morgenlied quesitons. |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:07:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.50 |
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/input/test/out-www/lily-971630970.ly
(ancient-accidentals.ly from http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/input/test/out-www/
collated-files.html) on the website appears to show the same doubleflat
accidental across all styles (which appears to be the same as the default
doubleflat). Is this correct?
Are there any accidental choices to make a doublesharp with the dots to
its
left and right, or one with dots on all four sides?
Is this the proper place to mention bugs for cvs lilypond versions, or
is
bug-lilypond preferred for that too?
In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.1/input/mutopia/F.Schubert/out-www/
morgenlied.pdf on the end of the first line in the lyrical staff, the
extender line coming off of du appears to be smaller than a period. Is there
currently, or should there be a limit to valid extender line lengths?
In the same piece, within the vocal line, there are a lot of stem down
notes
despite when near the bottom of the staff. Was this a slip caused by double
voicing in measure 3, an attempt to clone the original, or desired for other
reasons? If still desired (or cloning), why should they go down? I'm still
attempting to get my hands on another score to compare to myself.
Thanks again,
Edward Sanford Sutton, III
- Ancient accidental inconsistencies?; Morgenlied quesitons.,
Edward Sanford Sutton, III <=