scheme accessors

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> 
> I had a cold sweat when running the new 2.1.26, but then read:
> "The naming of exported Scheme functions now follows Scheme conventions."
> Ouf.
> 
> This is just a suggestion:
> It may be more idiomatic to define a setter for accessors. For
> instance, given the reader ly:music-property and the writer
> ly:music-set-property!:
> 
>   (define-public ly:music-property
>     (make-procedure-with-setter ly:music-property
>                                 ly:music-set-property!))
> 
> you can then use ly:music-property to access the property as before,
> but you can also use it with set!:

Can I ask for a patch?

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen