[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation error
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: compilation error |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:13:09 +0100 (CET) |
> > The less latest-version-or-newer packages are needed,
> > the better. lilypond already needs too much packages to work.
>
> What package dependencies do you suggest we drop?
Dependencies on package versions which haven't been released yet?
Normally, relying on a CVS version is dangerous.
> I have implemented PostScript output some three or four years ago.
> I have seen no user interest at all in output that does not need
> TeX, for example.
AFAIK, it has never worked reliably, at least this is the impression
I got after asking on the list.
> Fwiw, texinfo is only needed during build; and developers should
> know how to type apt-get upgrade (or suffer if they choose to use a
> more cumbersome system ;-)
Even then -- I tried to compile the texinfo CVS, which relies on a
brand new automake version which I had to compile before, which relies
on a brand new autoconf version which I had to compile before, etc.,
etc.
Werner
- Re: compilation error,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Reuben Thomas, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/03/01
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/02
- Re: compilation error, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/03/03
- Re: compilation error, Aredridel, 2004/03/05
- Re: compilation error, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/03/10
- Re: compilation error, Edward Sanford Sutton, III, 2004/03/12
- Re: compilation error, Edward Sanford Sutton, III, 2004/03/06