Re: Why not to implement everything in scheme?

[Paul Scott]

Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:

> Why not to implement everything in scheme and get rid of gcc -compiling of the
> source? Or, is it the lexical parser which forces the use of gcc?
>  
The general idea would be that C++ is compiled and scheme is 
interpreted.  The heavy calculations should often be more efficient in a 
compiled language.  The mixture of scheme and C++ makes an ideal 
combination.

Paul Scott