[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:05:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11.52, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > So it should be clear by now where I stand: I think it's an obvious
> > transition for SCORE users to start moving over the Lily. They're
> > reluctant to give up the tool, of course, because of its
> > sophistication, but I think that literally every 2 or 3 weeks the
> > reasons to jump to Lily increase, even for the community of
> > professionals currently working in SCORE.
>
> I think there is a one big problem with going to LilyPond for the
> majority of SCORE users. Adding a tweak is clumsy, and you have to rerun
> the program to see the result. Also the result of a tweak is less
> predictable, as anything besides extra-offset might impact spacing, line
> breaking, etc. Also, working with multi-page documents is a nightmare,
> since page breaks are hard to get right.
Did you try \pageBreak? :) IMHO, perfect page breaks is one of the things that
_must_ use human judgement; a machine knows too little to set all penalties
correctly. Once you have inserted your \pageBreaks, what's the nightmare?
--
Erik
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, (continued)
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Heikki Junes, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Erik Sandberg <=
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/20
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/20
- Page breaks, was: something else, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/22
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18