[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Laura Conrad |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:23:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "ES" == Erik Sandberg <address@hidden> writes:
ES> A fairly unrelated question is: Why are so many preferring
ES> PMX/MusiXTeX to Lily? I often have better chances finding good
ES> MusiXTeX scores on Werner Icking archive, than finding them on
ES> mutopia.
Not to discourage discussion of the original question, but I don't
think the number of scores on the Icking Archive versus the number on
Mutopia is a good measure of the relative number of users of PMX and
Lily. The Icking Archive is a repository of just about any kind of
scores (including those produced by non-free software, and probably
some lilypond), and only a small minority of the lilypond on the web
is ever submitted to mutopia.
Getting back to why to prefer PMX to lily -- there's the suggestion
Han-Wen made recently that I might prefer it because the development
cycle is less hectic and the half-life of the code might be longer.
I've been looking into it -- so far I've proved that the native input
is less friendly for barless music, but I might be able to figure out
editor macros to get around that.
--
Laura (mailto:address@hidden , http://www.laymusic.org/ )
(617) 661-8097 fax: (501) 641-5011
233 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, (continued)
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Graham Percival, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Laura Conrad <=
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Heikki Junes, 2005/08/18