[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pure simple-closures
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: pure simple-closures |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:08:45 +0200 |
On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman schreef:
>
> >
> > Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to
> > handle arbitrary length argument lists in scheme (the only way I
> > currently know is to build the list of arguments, cons in the function
>
> I think you're looking for the apply function,
>
> (apply func arg-list)
Ah yes, that's much better. So did you want me to put call_pure_function
in scheme?
- pure simple-closures, Joe Neeman, 2006/10/20
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/20
- Re: pure simple-closures, Joe Neeman, 2006/10/21
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/21
- Re: pure simple-closures,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/21
- Re: pure simple-closures, Joe Neeman, 2006/10/22
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/22
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/22
- Re: pure simple-closures, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/10/28