[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond development moved
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond development moved |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:43:04 +0100 |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> we've recently switched to GIT for version control. As a temporary
> measure, we had a repository at repo.or.cz. However, in collaboration
> with the savannah hackers, I've now successfully set up a git repository
> at savannah. Check it out at
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
>
> the repo contains both lilypond and the website (branch web/master). All
> the CVS committers have push access to the git repository as well.
>
> The push/pull URL for developers is
>
> ssh+git://git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
>
Hi,
I have just switched to git for lilypond source code and lilypond.org,
so I have a few questions (about both master and master-web heads):
1) Is comitting to CVS strictly forbidden from now?
2) Are the committers going to receive email notifications from
address@hidden like with cvs?
(or shall we just track the RSS feeds?)
3) How are we supposed to write commit messages?
(Shall we just copy the ChangeLog entries?)
4) As a consequence of 3), are ChangeLog entries still necessary?
At first sight, git seems to me a bit more complicated than cvs, but
it's so more featured and flexible!
Besides that, I'm sorry about the little delay in lilypond.org
translation, I was not at the computer at 2.10 release time; the most
serious is that the French download page is broken. I fixed it this
morning and pushed to git repository at sv.gnu.org, but when I'm writing
this lilypond.org is not updated.
Cheers,
--
John Mandereau <address@hidden>
- Re: lilypond development moved,
John Mandereau <=