lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: another skyline problem


From: Joe Neeman
Subject: Fwd: another skyline problem
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:44:21 +0200

Oops, forgot to send to the list...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe Neeman <address@hidden >
Date: Dec 5, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: another skyline problem
To: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>

On 12/4/06, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:

Consider this input:

  {
  \once \override DynamicText #'X-offset = #'-5.0
  %\once \override DynamicText #'Y-offset = #'5.0
    c\ff
  }

  \paper {
    ragged-right = ##t
  }

As can be seen in the attached image, lilypond doesn't move the ff
symbol up -- this is the right action.  However, if you comment out
the line overriding the Y-offset property you can see that it has no
effect, which is problematic.  I'm not sure how this can be solved
elegantly.  Perhaps it's necessary to give Y-offset a new meaning for
grobs which are floating below and above the staff, something like:
`pretend that the parent's vertical position is moved by that amount'.

I don't see that this is a problem. If a user wants the symbol to be moved from its default position, they can set extra-offset instead of Y-offset. If a user wants the symbol to be positioned at an absolute offset from its Y-parent, they can just set outside-staff-position to () in addition to setting Y-offset.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]