[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR categories
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: LSR categories |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:53:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Graham Percival escreveu:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> Why do you use exclusive categories? Isn't it better to devise some
>> sort of tagging scheme, eg.
>
> I'm reluctant to propose something unless I can do it myself (or if it's
> a clear feature request). And I don't want to put LSR on hold for
> another year while we wait for somebody to be sufficiently motivated to
> do it -- it took six months just for somebody to write a 34-line python
> script and change four lines in makefiles and SConscript files! I
> understand (well enough to modify, at least) the current input/test/
> build process, I understand directories, and I know how to copy files.
> Those are the tools I'm working with.
Putting
Tag:foo
into the output is not a difficult change to lilypond-book.py,
but you can already get the same result by simply putting
Tag:foo, Tag:bla
in the texidoc header. If you do this, make sure you use a standardized
format, so we can later change it to
tags = "foo, bla"
with an automated substitution.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- LSR categories, Graham Percival, 2007/01/24
- Re: LSR categories, yota moteuchi, 2007/01/24
- Re: LSR categories, Bertalan Fodor, 2007/01/24
- Re: LSR categories, Mats Bengtsson, 2007/01/24
- Re: LSR categories, Graham Percival, 2007/01/24
- Re: LSR categories, Graham Percival, 2007/01/24