Re: input/tolsr/

[Graham Percival]

Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 14:30, Graham Percival wrote:
>   
> > Thast sounds ok to me. Assuming I'm feeling energetic enough to write two 
> > separate examples, how should the LSR example compare to the regression test 
> > (ie. shorter/longer, explanatory comments, etc.)?
> >     
Pretty much the same.  Maybe add one or two 1-line comments, but that's 
the only thing I would change.  The only reason that we're not 
automatically using all regtests is that 90% of the regtests are for bug 
tests, not new features.  As long as you add the remaining 10% to 
input/tolsr/, I'm happy.  :)

I wouldn't bother with a snippet for "engraving improvements", though.  
For example, although the bug fix for #97 used new code (and thus 
Han-Wen would call it a new feature), most users would call that a bug 
fix.  Ditto for the vertical collision stuff -- it's a fantastic 
improvement for lilypond, but since users don't need to do anything 
different (it applies to all scores), we don't need a new snippet in LSR.

Cheers,
- Graham