[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.17.26 regression tests
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: 2.17.26 regression tests |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:02:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>; "Keith OHara" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: 2.17.26 regression tests
>
>> I'd seen the same long list of regressions before I uploaded the
>> release, and presumed it was down to slight padding changes. I plan
>> to run the pixel regression script today to see whether that has the
>> same problem.
>
>
> Done. 197 changed regtests, almost all down to minor text padding
> changes. They all look OK to me.
What's the word from the big scorers regarding the need to reevaluate
defaults?
Kieren? Janek?
--
David Kastrup