Re: snippets/new

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; "Pierre Perol-Schneider" 
<address@hidden>
Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: snippets/new


> On 12/04/14 12:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: Pierre Perol-Schneider
> > To: Phil Holmes
> > Cc: Devel
> > Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 12:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: snippets/new
> >
> > 2014-04-12 13:26 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes address@hidden:
> >
> > > > I'm assuming you've tried this with just "tagline = ##f" and it
> > > doesn't > work?
> >
> > > Yes of course
> >
> > > > The downside of this approach is presumably that you have to work
> > > out > how many lines are in the snippet and adjust the paper size > 
> > > appropriately?
> >
> > > Yes indeed.
> >
> > > AFAIK up to now, there is nothing easier.
> >
> > OK - it seems to me that we should not use this on "docs" tagged 
> > snippets, since a) it might affect how the snippets are compiled into the 
> > documentation, and b) it's code we would not want in all the documented 
> > snippets.
> >
> > --
> > Phil Holmes
> So is there anything that needs to be done with Doc - patch-wise?
>
> James


I don't think so.  Anything that should be done would be done with an LSR 
import, and 9 times out of 10 I check and push them without a patch.

--
Phil Holmes