Re: [SPAM] Re: Test Ponding tweets

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
>> To: "LilyPond Development Team" <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
>> Subject: Test Ponding tweets
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
>>> If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of
>>> a ponding, isn't it?
>>>
>>> So what to do with a ponding patch? Simply try to mimick the existing
>>> ones and hope the patch will pass? Rather not, isn't it?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>> Usr
>>
>>
>> My understanding is that the tweet must simply be well-formed HTML: so
>> if you can read it in an HTML editor, it should be good to go.
>
> Not really. All the tags (i.e. the angled brackets) are displayed
> explicitly if I open the file in a browser.

I think it is XML (possibly XHTML?) that should _read_ like valid HTML
when rendered.

I don't actually know the mechanism used for getting the stuff
on-screen.

-- 
David Kastrup